As technology evolves, so do the tactics used by scammers. Unfortunately, seniors often find themselves targeted by fraudsters who exploit their trust and unfamiliarity with emerging payment systems. The consequences of these scams can be devastating, both financially and emotionally.
It’s crucial for seniors, their families, and caregivers to understand the risks and learn how to safeguard against them. Common Payment Scams Targeting Seniors
How to Stay Safe Awareness is the first line of defense against these scams. Here are key steps seniors can take to protect themselves:
A Community Effort Family members, caregivers, and community organizations play an essential role in preventing elder fraud. Regular conversations about financial safety and staying informed about new scam tactics can make a significant difference. Join Our Webinar on Elder Fraud The IPA is proud to partner with the Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging for a vital member-only discussion: "A Multi-faceted Approach for Working with Older Adults who have Experienced Fraud and/or Scams"
Additional Resources If you’ve been the victim of a scam or want to help protect others, there are numerous resources available to assist:
The information provided on these webpages does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Remember, victims of fraud are just that – victims. Scammers use sophisticated methods to exploit vulnerabilities, but with the right resources and support, recovery is possible. Take action today to protect yourself and others from financial harm. Rep. French Hill (R-AR) was recently elected to be the chair of the House Financial Services Committee, and that’s likely to be positive for the payments industry. Rep. Hill spoke at the IPA’s annual conference in 2019, and while we need to be careful about making predictions based on anything from the pre-pandemic era, his talk does offer some clues as what we might see going forward. At the time, Mr. Hill said that Congress needed to focus on a number of issues including:
In addition, Rep. Hill laid out some of his plans for community banking in a press release even before he was elected. He focused on issues like brokered deposits and making it easier for banks to partner with fintechs. Under his leadership, we can expect the Committee will be interested in the issues that affect the payments industry. This should provide opportunities for making sure that legislation and regulations are tailored to protect the industry and its customers while providing room for innovation. The other benefit to having Rep. Hill as the chairman is that he recognizes the political realities of Washington. In 2019 and in his recent statement, he noted that many financial services issues have bipartisan agreement. In a narrowly divided House, and with a Senate that has a filibuster, having both sides of the aisle on board for a bill is helpful. Bipartisan legislation also tends to be more moderate than extremely partisan bills. Finding areas of bipartisan agreement have another benefit – it keeps the industry from being whipsawed every time control of Congress changes. He laid out his underlying philosophy at our conference back in 2019. “The ultimate beneficiary of this should be the American consumer,” Mr. Hill said. It will be up to the industry to show how the right regulatory regime serves that end. Ben Jackson is the Chief Operating Officer of the Innovative Payments Association, a leading trade association representing companies in payments. With over two decades of industry experience, Ben is dedicated to providing valuable information, advocacy, and support to help members improve financial outcomes for consumers, businesses, and government agencies. Changes are needed at the FDIC. Last week the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a study regarding how the Federal Reserve and the FDIC ”Should Address Weaknesses in Their Process for Escalating Supervisory Concerns.” In it, the GAO states that the FDIC in particular is lacking in three key areas: centralized tracking; vetting meetings, and rotation requirements. Taking these three areas in turn, this means that the FDIC lacks a centralized system for tracking supervisory recommendations, which limits the FDIC’s ability to identify emerging risks across the banks it supervises; a core function of the FDIC. Next, “vetting” means unlike other regulators, the FDIC does not have a formalized process to ensure that large bank examination teams and other relevant stakeholders are consulted before making changes or decisions, such as escalation decisions. Lastly, and again unlike other regulators, the FDIC does not require large bank case managers to rotate after a few years at one institution, introducing risk needlessly by failure to diversify the perspectives on one institution. This failure means that one employee’s error could have an outsized impact. The GAO report highlights several concerns shared by many in the payments industry, including, but not limited to, the fact that the FDIC does not seem to be tracking emerging threats to the banking system. The industry also is concerned that the FDIC appears to be ignoring the advice of the their own examiners in the field by “altering conclusions” and staff recommendations and being unreceptive to their insights. This suggests to me the FDIC is out of touch with the current marketplace. I have written several times regarding my concerns about the FDIC’s proposed rule on brokered feposits. If you read the FDIC’s proposed rule it is clear that the agency did not conduct any due diligence with respect to research, analysis, or impact to banks or consumers. The FDIC claims they need to amend the brokered deposit rules due to Synapse. But Synapse was not a bank and the agency’s proposal would not have prevented wrongdoings at Synapse from occurring in the first place. This kind of random federal action, which does not generally receive attractive headlines, nevertheless will have a big impact on how all Americans bank today and into the future. We should all be concerned when government at all levels takes a specific course of action but cannot explain why or share facts that support their case. Recently, republican members of the House Financial Services Committee echoed some of the concerns expressed by the IPA in our comment letter to the FDIC, saying: “The July 30 proposal cited the bankruptcy of Synapse Financial Technologies and the banking instability of last March as justifications for the undoing of the 2020 rule on brokered deposits (2020 Rulemaking). These justifications are disingenuous as neither of these situations were caused by brokered deposits. In fact, Synapse is not an insured depository institution. In the proposal, the FDIC asserts that deposits excluded from the definition of brokered deposits in the 2020 Rulemaking, “present similar risks as brokered deposits and could pose serious consequences.” Instead of performing analysis to substantiate this assertion, the FDIC relies on unsupported conjecture and anecdotal evidence.” Brian Tate, Esq., is the President and CEO of the Innovative Payments Association, the premier trade association for the payments industry. With a distinguished career spanning legal, regulatory, and advocacy roles, Brian leads the IPA in advancing the payments ecosystem. His dedication to fostering innovation and promoting sound policy ensures that members can deliver cutting-edge solutions to benefit consumers, businesses, and government entities. The Innovative Payments Association (IPA), the leading voice of the electronic payments sector, announces it’s newest member, Vixio Regulatory Intelligence. Vixio is a premier provider of regulatory technology (RegTech) solutions for the payments and gambling industries, offering actionable regulatory intelligence across 180+ jurisdictions globally.
Welcoming Vixio strengthens our commitment to advancing the payments ecosystem,” said IPA President and CEO Brian Tate. “Their expertise enhances our ability to support members and advocate for a secure, innovative, and evolving industry. We look forward to addressing opportunities and challenges together. Vixio shares the IPA’s vision of empowering the payments sector through collaboration and insight. By equipping organizations with their award-winning technology and unparalleled expertise, Vixio enables businesses to make informed strategic decisions, discover new markets, and minimize compliance risks. "At a time when many payments firms are experiencing growing regulatory fatigue, at Vixio, we are looking forward to working closely with the IPA to support our mission of helping organizations navigate the complexities of global regulatory environments,” said Roseanne Spagnuolo, Chief Content Officer at Vixio. “We’re eager to collaborate with the IPA and its members to help shape the future of payments through innovation and shared knowledge.” Vixio joins the IPA’s strong tradition of fostering collaboration and driving positive change in the payments industry. The IPA is actively engaged in pivotal discussions, such as advocating for earned wage access and other consumer-centric initiatives that ensure equitable access to financial tools while promoting compliance and security. For more information about the IPA and its members, visit ipa.org. To learn more about Vixio Regulatory Intelligence, visit vixio.com. Innovative Payments Association The Innovative Payments Association (IPA) is the leading voice of the electronic payments sector, including prepaid products, mobile wallets, and person-to-person (P2P) technology for consumers, businesses, and governments at all levels. The IPA encourages the efficient use of electronic payments, cultivates financial inclusion through educating and empowering consumers, and represents the industry before legislative and regulatory bodies. To learn more about IPA, visit ipa.org or follow us on LinkedIn. About Vixio Regulatory Intelligence Vixio is a regulatory technology (RegTech) provider for the ever-evolving payments and gambling industries. Vixio equips the world’s leading brands with actionable regulatory intelligence in 180+ jurisdictions globally. Combining award-winning technology with unparalleled expertise, Vixio’s GamblingCompliance and PaymentsCompliance platforms assist organizations in making strategic decisions, discovering new markets, and minimizing compliance risk by taking the heavy lift out of regulatory monitoring. For more information, visit vixio.com or follow Vixio Regulatory Intelligence on LinkedIn. Article Addresses Payments at End of 2024The payments industry is closing out 2024 with a range of unresolved issues, from regulatory uncertainty to the evolution of open banking and fraud mitigation.
Our President and CEO, Brian Tate, was recently interviewed by American Banker and shared insights on the fluid regulatory environment and its impact on banks, fintechs, and the broader payments ecosystem. In the article, he addresses the regulatory environment and said: "Everything is tied by a string. There are a lot of creative ideas that are waiting in the wings, but there's a lot of regulatory uncertainty out there." To read what Tate and other industry leaders are saying about the challenges and opportunities in 2025, check out the full article: Payments at the end of 2024: Lots of cliffhangers In my last blog, I wrote about how government is more important than politics for trade associations like the IPA. Now that we know the results of the election, the industry needs to keep in mind that nothing is guaranteed. We all operate under certain assumptions, including that the Trump Administration will lead to a lighter regulatory burden and be better for banks. In May, The New York Times wrote that “some in Mr. trump’s circles are urging the campaign to consider more substantial – even institution-altering – changes to the central bank ... ultimately making the rules less onerous for financial institutions for instance.” But let me ask a question. How much does the Trump organization pay in interchange fees on transactions at its properties? Hotels, golf courses, and resorts take in a lot of revenue, and cash is not the predominate form of payment in the United States. Imagine someone from the Trump organization told the president elect over the next three weeks, “we found a way to save millions.” This is purely a hypothetical, and I am not suggesting that it will happen. But it is an example of how regulatory risks can still exist no matter who is in office. The industry still needs to have a voice in government, and the IPA is committed to working with its members to advocate for a regulatory environment that promotes innovation for its customers. Ben Jackson is the Chief Operating Officer of the Innovative Payments Association, a leading trade association representing companies in payments. With over two decades of industry experience, Ben is dedicated to providing valuable information, advocacy, and support to help members improve financial outcomes for consumers, businesses, and government agencies. With the election around the corner, politics dominates conversations and news cycles, but government is more important for the IPA and its members. Politics is about photo ops, sound bites, and attending events while trying to win votes. Government is about creating, understanding, and implementing policies. Elections matter. No rational person would deny that. Some might even find them entertaining, getting caught up in the horse race. But it is what happens after the election, when whoever wins needs to make the government work for the country; that matters more. For trade associations like the IPA, the important work happens on the government side. Regardless of who wins control of the White House, the House, and Senate compliance will still be an important part of financial services. Regulators will still be watching the industry and proposing new rules. And we may see more legislation introduced into Congress. Before, during, and after the election, the IPA will continue its work to create a regulatory environment that fosters innovation and competition in financial services. Doing requires keeping up with legislative and regulatory proposals, educating members on what they might mean, and responding appropriately to them. A lot of fine print needs to be read, and the analysis needs to include what is not said along with what is said. Unlike politics, government is often quiet, detailed work that doesn’t make for good LinkedIn posts, but it remains essential to keeping the industry moving ahead. Ben Jackson is the Chief Operating Officer of the Innovative Payments Association, a leading trade association representing companies in payments. With over two decades of industry experience, Ben is dedicated to providing valuable information, advocacy, and support to help members improve financial outcomes for consumers, businesses, and government agencies. “Hurry up! Do something! You’re going to lose your money!” yelled the FBI agent on a panel at the IPA Compliance Boot Camp. Not only was I surprised, but so were all attendees. After taking a moment to reorient ourselves, the agent explained that fraudsters know that putting people under pressure makes it harder to think clearly. But it is not just criminals who are applying pressure. The regulators seem to be working on applying pressure to the payments industry as they release a flood of new regulations to govern just about every part of the fintech universe. The IPA’s mission is to help the industry deal with that pressure by advocating for our members in front of regulators and legislators, and by educating our members on the latest developments and best practices in compliance. Our Compliance Boot Camp, held earlier this month in Chicago, focused on the education part of our mission. Companies need compliance programs in place long before the regulators come knocking. As the world rapidly evolves, compliance plans need to cover the rules that are in place and anticipate what might be next. Being prepared can help compliance teams avoid mistakes that come with the pressure of regulations both new and old. The Boot Camp’s agenda provides clues for any innovator as to the areas they need to assess in their own plans. (The IPA would like to thank Discover for hosting this year’s boot camp, and Baird Holm for helping us to secure CLE credits for attendees.) We started with a Regulation E refresher, because that is a foundation regulation for all payments products. Companies need to have these basics covered before they start offering payments products. By the same token, we also had the FBI present on Crypto fraud. Like so many payments products, Crypto is a tool for, though not a cause of, crime. We also covered third party oversight, because innovation involves working with companies outside the bank to make interesting products available to customers. Looking ahead we discussed the new rules for Earned Wage Access products, and the possibilities that might be on the horizon when it comes to cannabis banking. We also spent time discussing open banking, which could create threats or opportunities for financial institutions and their partners. Whether open banking is a threat, or an opportunity will come down to preparation. Finally, we spent time on artificial intelligence. While AI is often touted as the next technological wave, the financial services industry has been using it for decades in areas such as fraud detection and credit decisioning. AI is a place where the new meets the old, because rules like those governing fair lending don’t change just because banks add new decision-making tools. Companies will need to evaluate this new technology through a traditionalist lens as well as an innovator’s lens to make sure they avoid traps. As the regulators move ahead with their agenda, compliance teams should take some time to plan out their agenda to ensure that they are prepared both to manage current regulators, and the new challenges that technology and regulatory changes may bring. Ben Jackson is the Chief Operating Officer of the Innovative Payments Association, a leading trade association representing companies in payments. With over two decades of industry experience, Ben is dedicated to providing valuable information, advocacy, and support to help members improve financial outcomes for consumers, businesses, and government agencies. New Innovative Payments Association guide designed to help financial institutions that work with fintechs navigate the complex world of regulatory compliance.
WASHINGTON, DC, Sept. 17, 2024 -- The Innovative Payments Association (IPA) recently released “IPA’s Guide to Developing a Bank-Fintech Regulatory Compliance Plan,” which helps financial institutions that work with fintechs navigate the complex world of regulatory compliance. “This guide is a big step forward in helping financial institutions and fintech companies create partnerships that are both innovative and compliant,” said Brian Tate, President and CEO of IPA. “At IPA, we believe regulatory compliance should not hinder innovation. Instead, it should be a framework that supports the development of new and exciting financial products. This guide provides the tools needed to build those frameworks.” As financial institutions work more with fintech companies, regulatory compliance is more important than ever. This guide offers a detailed look at the critical legal and regulatory issues that banks and fintechs must address. It's an essential resource for any organization looking to innovate in the financial sector while meeting strict regulatory requirements. It covers vital topics, including:
The guide is not meant to replace legal advice but to offer a framework to help companies develop comprehensive compliance programs, which protect both their interests and those of their partners and customers. About The Innovative Payments Association (IPA) is the leading voice of the electronic payments sector, including prepaid products, mobile wallets, and person-to-person (P2P) technology for consumers, businesses, and governments at all levels. The IPA encourages the efficient use of electronic payments, cultivates financial inclusion through educating and empowering consumers, and represents the industry before legislative and regulatory bodies. To learn more about IPA, visit ipa.org or follow us on LinkedIn. In today's interconnected business landscape, companies often rely on third-party vendors, suppliers, and partners to help them operate efficiently and effectively. While these relationships can bring numerous benefits, they also come with inherent risks. To mitigate these risks and ensure proper oversight of third-party relationships, it is crucial for organizations to go beyond traditional due diligence and establish a comprehensive third-party oversight framework. Due diligence is the initial step in evaluating and vetting potential third-party partners, but it is just the beginning. A comprehensive third-party oversight framework encompasses a range of ongoing activities and processes aimed at monitoring and managing relationships with third parties throughout the entire lifecycle. This framework should be designed to address key areas such as compliance, risk management, performance monitoring, and relationship management. One important aspect of building a comprehensive third-party oversight framework is defining clear roles and responsibilities within the organization. It is essential to designate individuals or teams who are responsible for managing third-party relationships, conducting ongoing monitoring activities, and ensuring compliance with relevant regulations and policies. These individuals should have the necessary skills and expertise to effectively oversee and manage third-party relationships. Another critical component of a comprehensive third-party oversight framework is establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics to measure the performance and effectiveness of third-party relationships. These KPIs can include factors such as service delivery, quality, compliance with contractual terms, and overall value provided by the third-party partner. Regular monitoring and reporting on these KPIs can help identify potential issues or concerns early on and facilitate timely corrective actions. In addition to monitoring performance, organizations should also pay close attention to compliance and risk management aspects of third-party relationships. This includes conducting regular audits, assessments, and due diligence reviews to ensure that third-party partners are meeting regulatory requirements, adhering to best practices, and managing risks effectively. It is important to have processes in place for addressing any compliance violations or issues that may arise during the relationship. Lastly, effective relationship management is a key component of a comprehensive third-party oversight framework. Building strong, collaborative relationships with third-party partners can help enhance trust, communication, and overall alignment of goals and objectives. Regular communication, feedback, and engagement with third parties can help foster a culture of transparency, accountability, and mutual respect. Going beyond due diligence and establishing a comprehensive third-party oversight framework is essential for organizations looking to effectively manage and mitigate risks associated with third-party relationships. By defining clear roles and responsibilities, establishing KPIs and metrics, focusing on compliance and risk management, and fostering strong relationships, companies can enhance the value and success of their third-party partnerships while minimizing potential pitfalls and challenges. IPA Compliance Boot Camp: The IPA's Compliance Boot Camp in Chicago offers a unique opportunity to deep-dive into the latest regulations and trends. From hot topics like Open Banking and Earned Wage Access to the legal implications of AI and serving cannabis businesses, this one-day event is packed with insightful sessions led by industry experts. Don't miss this chance to gain the knowledge you need to thrive in today's dynamic market.
|
Archives
December 2024
Categories
All
|