Innovative Payments Association
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Members
    • Partnerships
  • News & Events
    • Non-Member Newsletter
    • Newsroom
    • Events
    • Blog
    • Podcast
  • Member Resources
    • Glossaries & Reports
    • GRWG >
      • Recordings
    • Government Update
    • State Legislative Tracker
    • Financial Crimes Investigators
  • Issues & Advocacy
    • Comment Letters
    • Payments Litigation
    • Current Issues >
      • Earned Wage Access
      • Fraud Prevention
      • Prepaid Rule
    • Ongoing Issues >
      • Arbitration
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Banking as a Service
      • Brokered Deposits
      • CFPB
      • Covid Response
      • Durbin Amendment
      • FDIC & OCC
      • Privacy Legislation
      • Unclaimed Property
  • Join the IPA
    • IPA Wins
  • Boot Camp
Member Login   |   Join the IPA
Member Login   |   Join the IPA

 Comment Letters

New Remittance Tax Proposal Threatens Consumer Privacy and Financial Access

5/28/2025

0 Comments

 
The Innovative Payments Association (IPA), alongside several leading financial trade groups, has submitted a joint comment letter to the Senate Committee on Finance urging lawmakers to reject a proposed tax on remittance transfers.

The provision under consideration would impose a 3.5% tax on all cross-border money transfers, along with invasive requirements for U.S. citizens to verify their identity using sensitive personal information such as passports or Social Security numbers. This measure would turn financial services providers into de facto tax agents, responsible for collecting and reporting private consumer data to the federal government.

IPA President & CEO Brian Tate, one of the signatories to the letter, warns that this proposal would “create a dangerous precedent of government overreach, compromise financial security, and shift payments into unregulated underground channels.” The proposal threatens small businesses, service members, students, and families who rely on remittance services—not to mention the broader goals of financial transparency and anti-money laundering enforcement.

Instead of increasing security or efficiency, the tax would raise privacy concerns, increase compliance costs, and harm the very communities it claims to protect.
​
Download the full joint comment letter submitted to the Senate Committee on Finance.
DOwnload COmment Letter
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    August 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    November 2023
    May 2023

    Categories

    All
    Bank-Fintech
    Brokered Deposits
    CFPB
    Earned Wage Access
    EFT

Contact Us   |   Member Resources

IPA

110 Chestnut Ridge Rd, Suite 111
Montvale, NJ 07645
(202) 548-7200
Save The Date 
Innovative Payments Conference​
April 29 - May 1, 2026 

IPA Info

Home
​​About Us
Advocacy
Newsroom​

IPA Resources

IPA News & Events
Payments Podcast
Blog​
​Events


Safe Shopping
Consumer Resources if You've Been Scammed
© COPYRIGHT 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | Privacy Policy
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Members
    • Partnerships
  • News & Events
    • Non-Member Newsletter
    • Newsroom
    • Events
    • Blog
    • Podcast
  • Member Resources
    • Glossaries & Reports
    • GRWG >
      • Recordings
    • Government Update
    • State Legislative Tracker
    • Financial Crimes Investigators
  • Issues & Advocacy
    • Comment Letters
    • Payments Litigation
    • Current Issues >
      • Earned Wage Access
      • Fraud Prevention
      • Prepaid Rule
    • Ongoing Issues >
      • Arbitration
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Banking as a Service
      • Brokered Deposits
      • CFPB
      • Covid Response
      • Durbin Amendment
      • FDIC & OCC
      • Privacy Legislation
      • Unclaimed Property
  • Join the IPA
    • IPA Wins
  • Boot Camp